Divorce Law – Interim Research Findings Published

28/03/2017

Results from research looking at how current divorce law works in practice have been published; we look deeper at the key findings.

Following the Court of Appeal judgment in Owens v Owens, in which a wife’s appeal from a refusal to grant a decree nisi of divorce was dismissed, the research highlights the requirement for change of divorce law in England and Wales.

The project, Finding Fault, is led by Professor Liz Trinder of Exeter University and is funded by the Nuffield Foundation. The aim of the research is to understand how the current law on the ground for divorce and civil partnership dissolution operates in practice, whilst also exploring whether and how the law might be reformed. The research looks at three central questions:

  • How does the current law work in practice during the appeals process?
  • What does the ‘duty of the court to enquire, so far as it reasonably can, into the facts alleged’ mean in practice?
  • Is there a desire and requirement for law reform, and if so, how?

KEY INTERIM FINDINGS

  • The majority of divorces are based on ‘fault’, i.e. blaming one spouse for the marriage breakdown.
  • Using fault (adultery or unreasonable behaviour) means the divorce can take as little as three months, instead of the usual wait of at least two years.
  • Divorce petitions are not necessarily accurate records of who or what caused the breakdown of the marriage. Petitions can be based on compromise statements, designed to minimise conflict and upset.
  • The court cannot examine whether allegations are true or false and petitions are taken at face value. ‘Rebuttals’ written on the form by respondents are ignored unless the respondent files a formal ‘Answer’ to defend said petition.
  • Very few petitions appear to be rejected on fundamental legal grounds, whether ‘true’ or not.
  • Fault can create or aggravate conflict. This can, in turn, affect discussions about children or joint finances where the law expects both parties to work collaboratively.
  • Currently, there is no evidence from this research that the current law does indeed protect the law of marriage.
  • Modification of the divorce law is long overdue. A single system of notification of intent to divorce would be clearer, more authentic and unbiased between petitioner and respondent.

The interim report concludes:

‘In reality, we already have divorce by consent or ‘on demand’, but masked by an often painful, and sometimes destructive, legal ritual with no obvious benefits for the parties or the state. There is no evidence so far from this study that the current law does anything to protect marriage. The divorce process is currently being digitised. This is a timely opportunity for law reform so that divorce is based solely on irretrievable breakdown after notification by one or both spouses.’

More information

For more information on divorce law please contact Catherine Polli, Head of Family at catherine.polli@pinneytalfourd.co.uk or call 01708 229444 for advice and comments.

The contents of this article are for the purposes of general awareness only. They do not purport to constitute legal or professional advice. Specific legal advice should be taken on each individual matter. The law may have changed since this article was published. This article is based on the law as of March 2017.

28/03/2017

Popular Insights

Footer bg

Would you like to know more?

For help and advice, talk to a member of our team. They can advise on the best options in your matter.

Call: 01708 229 444 Email us

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)